Introduction
Two countries, 8 cities and 11 schools later I have seen some really
innovative ideas, met some really dedicated educators, had a good chance to
reflect on what we do at HSS, and considered where we are heading as a school
and myself as a school leader.
It is clear innovation is not just about fancy furniture, shared
learning spaces and interconnecting classrooms. Truth is I didn't see a lot of
them. Each school or school district's innovation addressed their particular
need. To allow them as educators to better engage and teach their students in
their school communities. Whether that be children from Jet-setting parents
developing immersion language programmes so that their children can travel and
be little global citizens or small country schools using technology to connect
and collaborate their teaching and learning for the academic and social benefit
of their schools. Whatever these schools did they had a clear direction,
ownership and understanding of why they are doing it and how it fits into their
schools vision for learning. They also have given 100% commitment to their
project and overcome barriers. Too often when we introduce a new idea or
innovation into the school we don't work hard to ensure all stakeholders have
ownership (including students). We tend to cut corners so the full benefits of
the project can be missed and we give up when barriers come to light. Often our
answer is rather than working hard to implement an innovation to its full
potential we water it down so it's not too much work for the 'Poor old
Teacher." Clearly, in all the schools I visited commitment and hard work
were evident in bucketfuls.
Even though each school innovative Learning Environment was different
and based on their needs they did share some factors/ principles that are key
to being a true innovative Learning Environment in the 21st Century.
Common Ground
Student agency is the biggest innovation evident in nearly all the
schools I visited. Students owning and driving their learning. Students in a
number of schools knew the schools learner qualities/ values well and had been
given the opportunity to decide what they were and what they looked like in the
classroom. This was most evident at the Ladysmith Nanaimo School
District, Compass High School and at the Colorado
Academy but most others had their values and learner qualities
visually displayed around the school. It was impressive to see students
tracking their learning, such as at Compass with their
Learning Plan, and able to articulate and take responsibility for what they
needed to do to graduate or complete a particular project. The teacher advisor
had an important role in the schools where this was most effective.
I believe that many (dare I say most) NZ schools only pay 'lip service'
to the concept of student agency because of two quite diverse reasons; either
we are scared to let go of the reins just in case the student goes 'Off
Task," or, when we do attempt to take the student-led / democracy type
model we don't spend enough time embedding our model and the necessary skills
into the student's learning so the students struggle to drive their learning as
there are just too many choices and no structure to hang it on. We need to find
something in between these two scenarios.
All schools were doing some form of Inquiry model that involved explicit
integration of subjects. Many used a Humanities (English, Social studies) and
STEAM (Science, Technology, English, Arts and Maths) model of integration. The
big focus was around student ownership and understanding of the inquiry
process. In many of the schools the students understood the process well and
were able to articulate where they were at.
Relevant, authentic, and with a genuine audience, along with student-led
are clearly the key words to engaging the 21st Learner. Understanding 'What's
the point,' 'where is this heading?' ‘Who is this for?' And 'why are we
doing it 'are questions that sit in the front of the mind of our generation Y
& Z students.
At a number of schools an important part of their Inquiry process were
opportunities for students to present to a genuine audience. Many of the
schools had presentation nights, where not just parents but, other educators
and members of the community could come along and share the learning with the
students. In some schools student’s project "Made a difference"
whether it be developing a outdoor habitat with the local community or working
with International Charity organisation to raise funds for their cause. In most
cases students had real ownership of the project and how it was presented as
the ideas came from them. Teachers input was around questioning and reinforcing
the process.
In most schools I visited the staff had invested a great deal of time
getting to know their students. We talk often about the importance of
relationships but in some of the schools I visited the school was such a
consistent stabilising factor in the students’ lives that these very close
relationships were vital. The student advisor concept was a great one for the secondary
and middle areas and at primary level could be put in place for the 'At-risk'
students to provide that extra person to look out for these students' needs and
pay attention to their lives.
I wasn't sure how it would be visiting the number of secondary and
Middle schools that I did but when you consider I was looking at the big
picture of education and with the Nelson Clusters Community of Schools (COS) just
getting established it turned out a real highlight of the trip. The first thing
that struck me was connections that exist between these areas of schooling.
Many teachers had worked across the sectors and there appeared to be a lot of
interaction between each sector. One of the reasons this happens in the school
district model which is used in both the States and Canada is shown by the
following. In Canada in particular the school districts think of education as a
whole and look at the shared needs of all students across the district. This
big picture, I feel, is more effective than the 'Island' model Tomorrows
Schools created in NZ. Sharing resources, professional development,
interventions as well as having big buying power as a single organisation. No
doubt it would come with its risks as I could see at Douglas County School
District and it would be a hard pill to take after 26 years of self-governance.
We certainly wouldn't want to see a return to the local Department of Education
model we had in the 80s. But managed the right way and governed and owned by
the local school communities, I think it would be highly effective and really
just the next step down the COS road.
A number of schools utilised the resources and people in their local
communities extremely well to the point that they were features of their
school. Whether it be local artists working within the schools, Business
partnering with the school on a particular project, sharing resources, skilled
staff and assisting financially, linking with local councils to improve local
environment or drawing on Tribal leaders to share stories of the past. All of
these things helped weave the schools into the fabric of their community. I
believe we do this sort of thing in New Zealand but not to the same depth and
without the same two way commitment. We can do this better.
ELearning was as big as I was expecting it to be in the schools I
visited. In many schools it didn't dominate the landscape but it did have an
important role as a tool for learning. BYOD was surprisingly not a big feature
of any of the schools I visited. Most schools provided the equipment. Apple
products feature with iPads in the junior areas being popular and Mac Book Airs
being a feature of senior primary, middle and secondary school. Many schools
also use Chromebooks but I felt we were further down the Google track than most.
The last shared observation is more an administration item but when I
think about it I think if I was to implement it at HSS it would free up my time
so I could put more energy and commitment into other areas. I'm talking about
admin. Office structure. Most schools I visited, (all were a similar or smaller
size than HSS, apart from the independent schools but their lower schools were
around 300 -400) had full time office managers. They did a lot of the admin.
work that I do currently and allowed the Principal and the management teams to
get on and worry about Teaching and Learning, particularly around HR, which
seems to occupy a great deal of my time.
The Highlights Package
The following are a few individual highlights that stood out. I have
only written brief summaries as a more full description is available under that
school's post in the Blog:
Connected Schools - the idea of collaborating via AV is not new
but the formalised structured approach at the School district in the Rocky
Mountains in Canada was amazing and highly effective. This project has brought
small vulnerable schools together to create larger cohorts of learners and in
doing so impacted positively on these students' lives.
Habitat - The children at Hampden Street enjoy tree planting but the day they
finish do they really give those trees and why they planted them another
thought? I like how the Habitat at Castle Rock
Elementary was owned by all the students and had a strong link
with the local community. The project was embedded in the school culture and
ethos.
Project X - This was a great way to build teachers
understanding of what happens at various levels of schooling across the
sectors. The 'Bus tours' across subjects proved highly effective at the Colorado
Academy as did the 'Student for a day' project. These would both
be useful ideas as we go about trying to understand what each of us do in the
various sectors within our community of schools.
Immersion Programmes - This was a very innovative and
ambitious programme but the concept of having all students bilingual by the end
of their schooling is amazing. The understanding that it's a school
responsibility to develop global citizens in our connected world is an
important one and learning a second language is part of that as is connecting
genuinely in some way to people/ students from other parts of the world. This
is the vision for the Avenues World School and as they
open schools across the globe I see exciting times ahead.
Student Interns - This concept would work best at
Secondary but Compass High School's intern programme is
successful because it gives relevance to students learning at an important time
of their lives. However, relevance of learning is vitally important at all
levels.
Community Coordinator - A really innovative use of staffing
at Sound View Academy. It addressed the real need to connect
to their community and to keep a finger on the pulse outside the school in this
volatile area. The role is a good one as it covers many bases and wouldn't come
with the same stigma as a social worker for many parents.
Links to OECD Principles and ILE Model
I started this journey motivated by the OECD report on Innovative
Learning Environments so it's only fitting I return to this. The report
identified seven transversal principles that underpin an ILE and also developed
a ILE model (tense) of best practice. Below I will use these tools as a
form of reflection of my journey.
- Learners at the Centre
- I
felt all the schools I visited put their learners at the centre of what
they are doing. The emphasis on student led learning, the importance
placed on knowing each student as an individual not a reading group or a
behaviour issue, and the emphasis on student's ownership of the learning
process such as the inquiry model or the learner qualities showed me that
the ILE I visited were student centred. The best example of this principle
was the Learner Plans, intern programme and student advisors at Compass
High School. These initiatives put their student at the
centre and focused on the individual needs. They allow students to set
challenging personal goals who then, with guidance of their advisor, are
motivated to achieve them. The Ladysmith Nanaimo School District Community
of Learners Project promotes self-directed and self -regulated
learning.
- The Social Nature of
Learning -
Many of the schools I visited saw collaborative learning as a key part of
their programmes. Students worked cooperatively in pairs or small group on
in-class inquiry projects and some schools had large groups of students
working cooperatively on large long term projects. A good example of this
was an integrated technology project at Colorado Academy where
students were converting an old school bus into a camper. The Connected
Classrooms in the Canadian Rockies was a great example of how
important the social nature of learning can be. With small cohort groups
the connected classroom project has allowed students to collaborate with
students of the same age from other schools on an almost daily basis via
an audio visual connection. They also get the opportunity to get together
on field trips or regular school visits to share their learning
personally. Both the independent schools, Colorado
Academy and Avenues World School have
many spaces around the school that allow students to come together to
collaborate. These include innovative seating, wifi, and wall whiteboards
and whiteboard tables. They also had quiet areas where students knew they
could go to study.
- Emotions are Integral to
Learning - In
many of the schools I visited student engagement and motivation was high.
This was generally achieved through the innovative approach the school or
schools were taking to cater for the particular needs of their learners. A
great example of this was at Kumsheen High School where
students were working with Ashcroft High School on
a photography project. These students were reviewing photos from a recent
joint field trip to Victoria, where they had utilised the skills of a
professional photographer as an expert. The students were very proud of
their work and were keen to share with the larger group the audio visual
link which Ashcroft provided. The teachers very much took a back seat
facilitator role. This student-led model was a hallmark of most of the
schools I visited. Students were motivated and engaged as they were
working on relevant and authentic topics they were interested in and they
owned and drove their own learning. They also enjoyed being able to share
their project with a genuine audience at Presentation nights.
- Recognising Individual
Difference -
Individualised learning was a feature of many of the schools I visited.
The students were seen as individuals all at different stages of the
learning journey and with individual needs created by their unique environment.
I didn't see a great deal of students lumped together because they read at
about the same level. Once again Compass High School's Learner
plan was an individualised document designed by the student and the
teacher advisor particularly for that student and his/her needs. The Ladysmith
Nanaimo School District were adapting their Community of
Learners project so it better reflected the values and needs of local
First Nation People. This school's Inquiry model was not a linear stepped
process and students can start where it suits them according to what they
bring to the project (Prior knowledge/ understanding/ skills). At Sound
View Academy the community coordinator has a key role linking with
families and keeping a 'finger on the pulse' of the community. He ensures
individuals are safe and barriers that might prevent a student from
attending school are avoided.
- Stretching all
Students - In
a student-led environment the role of the teachers is critical to ensure
students are stretching themselves and remain focused on their task. That
role is not about cracking the whip but to activate/ motivate and inspire
students to stretch themselves. At Colorado Academy I
attended a Global Awareness Class where very motivated students were
working hard on a City Design project. The motivation came from an
engaging task and students being given the opportunity to share with peers
and seeking their feedback. This school had a well-established buddy
programme which saw upper school students buddied with lower school students
which included some in-class support and pastoral support around the
playground, including a shared Zoo trip at the end of the year. The
student also serves as a positive role model.
- Assessment to Learning - Like NZ both the US and
Canada are going through a transition when it comes to assessment. In the
US the "No Student Left Behind" policy has led to an
over-emphasis on the one-off test results and so this has made them quite
high stakes. The formal standards testing is part of both countries' assessment
programme, as is an emphasis on Grades (A, B, C etc), but this is
changing. The Ladysmith Nanaimo School District are
looking at not sending home grade based reports in Grade K to 9. This is a
radical shift and has caused a stir amongst grade obsessed parents. Self
and Peer Assessment are popular and effectively used in the Inquiry
approach and with more of a student-led programme teachers have time to
conference with individuals and so the focus is more on the more effective
formative assessment. Many students can articulate where they are at
and what their next steps of learning are.
- Building Horizontal
Connections - The importance of a relevant authentic
curriculum is vital and a hallmark of most schools I visited. Student
engagement was high as they drove their learning focusing on topics that
were relevant to their world. Students understood and owned their schools
inquiry model and this provided a framework for the students to explore
their topics. Genuine integration of subjects was common place and
students were given greater time to completing their Inquiry study at
depth. Many schools used local community members/ business people/
cultural leaders as experts or guides for students as they worked through
their inquiry. Ladysmith Nanaimo School District Community
of Learners project did this well as did Castle Rock
Elementary’s Habitat project. At Compass High School the
Internship programme allows students to see how their study can lead to
genuine outcomes in the 'real world.' The Avenue World
School clearly has made the biggest step towards Global
connections with their language and World Schools concept.
OECD Innovative Learning Environment Model
Looking at the four key areas in this model it clarifies how most of the
schools I visited can be classified an Innovative Learning Environment. Many of
the schools are innovative in all four areas and I feel to be true ILE they
need to be, ie. The school may have a wonderful modern learning environment but
if their teachers are not motivators or your curriculum is not relevant student
engagement is not going to be high and learning outcomes will be poor.
On reflecting on my journey I have noted some key considerations
for each of the four quadrants of the model:
Learners:
- Leading their own learning
- Has ownership of learning
processes and key learner qualities
- Needs access to a variety of
ways of learning - collaborative in groups, individually, peer learning,
reciprocal learning and teacher directed.
- Ability to set challenging
personal goals and track and drive own achievement
Content:
- Integrated subjects
- Relevant and authentic
- Connected to community
- Open ended, engaging and
motivating
- A variety of Assessment
tools used - self, peer, formative.
- Inquiry based programmes
with genuine opportunity to present to a real audience.
Resources:
- eLearning tools to enhance
learning
- Local experts and resource people
- Opportunities to engage and
collaborate on a project with community.
- Opportunities to participate
in projects that "Makes a difference "- locally, nationally or
globally.
Educators:
- Build strong relationships
with students.
- Ability to adapt to a
variety of roles - facilitator, activator, direct teacher, learner.
- Able to collaborate with
other educators
- Creative use of staffing to
create roles that target needs
- Professional development to
share knowledge across the school and wider educational sectors.
- Flexibility and integration
across sectors
Implication for Schools:
Learner Qualities:
When the MOE released the revised curriculum in 2007 many schools got
busy developing their own school curriculum that interpreted the National
document and made it reflect the need of their schools. They developed learner
qualities/ learner lights or whatever other creative name they could come up
with. Hampden Street was one of them. Like most schools there was nothing wrong
with the words we chose and for the most part the process we followed but we
made two significant mistakes;
We over complicated the process with too many words and complicated rubrics to
explain them and secondly and most importantly, we didn't give students
ownership. We needed to invest time ensuring students owned and understood the
words and knew how they related to them as a learner. In a number of schools I
visited, this process has been done well. Students helped decide what word best
reflects their learning and place in the school and then students along with
staff develop the descriptors that interpret the word. I like the idea of
getting maybe syndicate groups and new staff together in the hall and’re-write'
the descriptors for the Learner qualities. Then these are displayed in classes
and frequently revisited by teachers and students. The Ladysmith Nanaimo School
districts qualities were called the 'The Four Cs", maybe we should
consider making our learner qualities something catchy also.
Inquiry Learning:
So many Schools in New Zealand talk up their Inquiry Learning process
but in most cases it is something we do to students. The students don't own it
and most can't articulate the steps and where they sit on the process. Students
often struggle to see the relevance because they are not sure who the audience
is and they feel it is being driven by someone else, the teacher. The
Inquiry models I saw were student owned and students could articulate where
they were at and where they were heading. The presentation evenings and
showcases gave students a genuine audience. Students need to be introduced to
the model at a young age and build up a language of inquiry that can develop
through their schooling. The teacher needs to step back and allow the students
to decide on pathways through their Inquiry that is relevant to them. We need
to ensure that the topics we choose to study are authentic and have a relevant
context. We also need to ensure students have genuine opportunities
to present their work to an audience, whether that is the class, radio station,
a showcase, sharing with students at another school or by working with a local,
national or global organisation, sharing their work and views. We also need to
ensure we allow sufficient time to complete student Inquiries (after all, we
are finding it hard to complete our teacher inquiries in our year long
timeframes). We should consider three large Inquiries rather than trying to
squash in four. With the assessment pressures, sports commitments and so on,
dropping to three inquiries makes sense. We would just need to be smart and
more explicit when showing our integration.
Sharing the Sector:
It has been great to hear the progress the Nelson Cluster has made on
developing our community of schools (COS) in my absence. It sounds very
exciting for our schools. However, it is vital that we take the time for
teachers to understand what is going on at the various levels of schooling and
a "Project X" type approach would be a great way to build
understanding across the sectors. This would need to happen before starting to
build anything new as a COS. To truly merge the 'islands' that our schools have
become I think we need to live island life at each level before we can make too
many judgements about what we need to develop.
Across Sector Collaboration:
The COS is a step in the right direction but I believe the idea of a
functional community that has a single board and the power to support schools,
provision professional development, assist with management recruitment, and use
its size to better leverage bulk purchases etc would be the way forward for our
schools. It would breakdown the "islands" and associated competition
model created by Tomorrows Schools.
Connecting with the Community:
In Nelson we have so many talented people in so many different sectors
of the community. The arts are so strong in our region but how do we draw on
this talent. Although a full time 'Artist in Residence' may not be possible it
could be something we share with other schools. We could rotate a variety of
artists around our schools. This would give them exposure to our parents and
school community and give the chance for our students to find inspiration from
a genuine working artist. We also have so many innovative and successful
businesses in Nelson. Looking for opportunities for public/private partnerships
would give the business good exposure in our school community and in wider
Nelson and would maybe provide us with the skills, knowledge and funding to aim
big for some of our projects; Whether it be funding a programme like our Music
programme or assisting with a larger building project. I believe with some
commitment and energy we could make this a reality.
A Community Project:
I really like the idea of taking a community project that is a
partnership with local community stakeholders that would really make a
difference in the local area. A waterway improvement. A wetlands recovery,
planting natives are just a few examples. A great way for students to make a
genuine contribution to their community. Like any inquiry, students would need
to own the concept and be able to feel they have had input into the planning
and development.
Administration:
Even the toughest of tough schools in the Bronx of New York had
administration support to a level that the Principals were able to focus solely
on their roles as Leaders of learning. All personnel, finance, and general
admin and most communications were dealt with by full time office staff with
the Principal simply over-seeing and rubber stamping this work. I believe
schools need to look at their office and, if budget allows, consider a higher
degree of admin support. This would also allow for the employment of a highly
skilled level of applicant who may be looking for full time work.
No Silver Bullet
Although I learnt a lot on my travels and have gained excellent
knowledge of Innovative Learning Environments there were a number of areas
where I didn't find the answers I was seeking and in some cases the schools
were not as far down the track as HSS in particular areas.
Mathematics - Although did see a variety of Mathematics
programmes I didn’t see anything that solved the issue of how do we make maths
relevant and engaging whilst still covering the key areas of mathematical
fundamentals - basic facts, multiplication tables, fractions etc. Many school
talked about integrating Maths (STEAM) but I neverhad the opportunity to see
this in action. The Avenues had gone down the road of Singapore Maths but I'm
not sure this very Asian, almost cultural, approach to maths would work in NZ
schools. I'll be keeping an eye on the Avenues. Colorado Academy has revised
their Maths programme but again I didn't see it in action. I will be in touch
with Eric from CA to find out more. So no Silver bullet in maths.
eLearning - Apart from the Avenues World School, I didn't see
any schools that would be as advanced in HSS in using eLearning as an effective
tool to help learning. Our school would be better equipped than most (apart
from 3D printers!).
Assessment - Most schools felt quite conflicted around assessment. They know the importance of the
formative type assessment - feedback and of peer and self-assessment but are
hamstrung by the need for National testing and the high stakes associated with
this and with the traditional grade system. This is an area most are focused on
resolving at the moment. I guess watch this space. So no Silver bullets for
assessment.
Final Word
Many of the ideas I have come back with are not necessarily new to NZ
and even to schools I have worked in. I imagine there will be teachers who will
be saying "We do that at our school." We are very good at saying this
but the two biggest differences I saw from many of the schools I visited on my
tour compared to many NZ schools are commitment and student led
learning. We have all done Inquiry Learning with our classes but most of
the time it is something we have done to the students. They didn't own it and
often didn't even understand it. Whatever these schools have done they have
passionately committed to it. They saw it through to fruition and have reviewed
and evolved their project. It is a little bit of a hallmark of many schools to
move from one education fad to the next without going into any depth. We almost
just tick the box.
Many New Zealand schools are dragging their heels when it comes to
allowing students to lead their learning. This has been at their peril as we
see increased disengagement and poor behaviour. Teachers struggle to understand
their role in a student-led environment and often fall back into the mission
control mode/sage on the stage. Clearly this has to change and as a school
Hampden Street is already down this path, but we need to identify what the
student and teacher roles looks like at each level.
Teaching can be a challenging job, no doubt about that and having worked
in low decile schools in NZ and visiting some pretty tough schools overseas it
takes a dedicated passionate person to work in these schools. They put up with
a lot, work long hours, and don't receive a lot of thanks but do the job
because they want to make their students' lives better. It was interesting to
read HSS evaluation of Term two. There was some great stuff in there, however,
when I read the lows from the term I noticed a number of negative things that
made me think that at times we really need to take a deep breath and be
grateful for what we have. Many of the things were so minor, some were situations
that are out of our hands. Our schools are well provisioned, safe environments
and although everything isn't perfect, they are a lot better than what many
teachers face in some pretty tough schools around NZ and around the globe. It
would be great if teachers could consider this before considering something a
low. Life is too short to sweat the small stuff. To make a difference we need
to focus on the big picture for better or for worse.
This sabbatical has been fantastic both personally as I feel refreshed
and relaxed, and professionally as I have a lot of time to reflect on my role
and our school. I am now looking forward to getting back to work and leading
the staff into an exciting and challenging time in education.
A Community Project: